HOME | MY ACCOUNT | POWER SEARCH | REGISTER | MEMBER LIST | SUGGEST CATEGORY


No Secrets

http://catb.org/~esr/nosecrets/ Open source leader Eric S. Raymond web page seeking information on how Unix trade secrets were legally nullified in the past. Demonstrating the nonexistence of Unix trade secrets
You can help stop the SCO attack on IBM and the Linux community. I'm looking for ways that Unix trade secrets may have been legally this suit is groundless. Now I want to know if you have ever had read access to proprietary Unix source code (not just binaries and documentation) under
SCO > Boycott, Lawsuits No   Secrets

Write a Review   Add to My Favorite   Refer it to Friend   Report Broken Link  

Average Visitor Rating: 0.00 (out of 5)
Number of ratings: 0 Votes

Visitor Rating




Popular Tags

#   A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  


Google Ads




Other links at SCO > Boycott, Lawsuits
Tries to sort some claims, counterclaims of fact and law, with no negative rhetoric. Focus: legal status of Linux, likelihood SCO will succeed in its efforts; formats: HTML, MS Word. Infrequently Asked Questions too.
Category:

Random Quote:
with thanks to Gregg Sperling. In recent months, the SCO Group (formerly Caldera) has sought to undermine the viability of Linux, and of open source software generally, through legal action and the threat of legal action. The result has been outrage in the open source community, as reflected in
waiting for hand_moderation

Regularly updated summary page with indexed links to all of their SCO vs. IBM and Linux related stories. [Computerworld]
Category:

Random Quote:
SCO was ordered to pay $2.55 million to Novell for collecting Unix licensing revenue from Sun Microsystems Inc. that it wasn't entitled to collect.
Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window. Subscribe to Computerworld 40 years of the most authoritative source of news and information for IT leaders. SCO loses another round in Unix fight, must pay

By Stephen Leibowitz. The contention that Linux infringes on SCO IP is wrong. Perceptive article covers all main aspects of case, suggests ways Linux community can address these problems.
Category:

Random Quote:
The purpose of this writing is to express my view on the controversy concerning The SCO Group and the Linux operating system. Like most independent observers, I disagree with SCO’s claims in this area. The next four sections discuss why I think that SCO is wrong. The last section makes
waiting for hand_moderation

Treats legal aspects of SCO vs. IBM and Linux case: news, extensive analyses, big story archive, hard to find documents, large amounts of carefully researched information, quote database, well used fora. [Creative Commons License]
Category:

Random Quote:
When you want to know more but don't know where to look. Your contributions keep Groklaw going. Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. PJ is a paralegal, not a lawyer. Even when lawyers write or contribute to articles, it is
waiting for hand_moderation

Business division managing SCO Unix system intellectual property. Many documents: court filings, complaint excerpts, FAQ, GNU GPL, official letter threatening intellectual property enforcement against all Linux customers.
Category:

Random Quote:
The SCO Group, Inc. -- Nasdaq: SCOX
Many IT users are concerned about using Linux since they have become aware of the allegations that Linux is an unauthorized derivative work of the UNIX® operating system. Users have come to SCO asking what they can do to continue to run their businesses. SCO has created the SCO source business




Main Category
Pagerank Statistics
PR 8
3 site(s)
PR 7
16 site(s)
PR 6
57 site(s)
PR 5
77 site(s)
PR 4
98 site(s)

Directory Statistics

Links: 845
Categories: 113


Yahoo! News


Top 10